✦ Allahabad High Court · 19 Feb 2025

Uma Shankar Chaudhary v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Writ Petition No. 5388 of 2024MANO, ANISH KUMAR GUPTA2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 99. The petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail such other remedy as may be advised. (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 19.2.2025 Jaideep/- JAIDEEP BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Judgment

disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the revenue authorities for demarcation of his holding.

6.

The demarcation exercise is held under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. A procedure is prescribed for availing the said remedy. However, the petitioner did not avail the said remedy and instead filed an application before District Magistrate for measurement/spot inspection. It appears that in the spot inspection, it transpired that the land of the petitioner has not got affected by the construction of the dam.

7.

Indisputably, the dam was constructed more than forty five years back and consolidation has been held in the village.

8.

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we are not inclined to adjudicate on the factual dispute sought to be raised by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution.

Operative part

9.

The petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail such other remedy as may be advised. (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 19.2.2025 Jaideep/- JAIDEEP BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 19 Feb 2025. The bench was MANO, ANISH KUMAR GUPTA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 5388 of 2024). ← Search more judgments