✦ Allahabad High Court · 16 Apr 2025

Pradyuman Gupta v. State of U.P & Anr.

No. 42124 of 2024ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. In view of the above, the applicants are directed to file the original deed of compromise before the court below within a period of 15 days from today.
  • Para 99. With the aforesaid direction, the present application is disposed of. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Ujjawal UJJAWAL UJJAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Judgment

1.

Heard Sri Rajnish Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ram Tiwari, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Ms. Ruchi Mishra, learned AGA for the State.

2.

The present application has been filed to quash the summoning order dated 4.1.2019 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.11881 of 2019 (State vs. Pradyuman Gupta), arising out of Case Crime No.612 of 2018, under Sections-498A, 504, 506 IPC & Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station-Chakeri, District-Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of A.C.M.M. III, Kanpur Nagar.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that dispute between the parties is matrimonial in nature and both the parties have settled their dispute amicably and entered into a written compromise dated 1.4.2022. It has been requested that the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of aforesaid compromise.

4.

Learned AGA states that the impugned proceeding cannot be quashed until the aforesaid compromise is verified.

5.

In view of the above, the applicants are directed to file the original deed of compromise before the court below within a period of 15 days from today.

6.

In case such a compromise is filed by the applicants, the court below will verify the said compromise after summoning the parties within a period of two months from the date of filing the compromise and after verification, the court below will dispose of the impugned proceeding in accordance with law.

7.

For a period of two months or till verification of compromise, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

8.

However, the parties are at liberty to file a fresh application under Section 528 BNSS to quash the impugned proceeding on the basis of verified copy of compromise, if need arises.

9.

With the aforesaid direction, the present application is disposed of. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Ujjawal UJJAWAL UJJAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — ss. 3, 4; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 16 Apr 2025. The bench was ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 42124 of 2024). ← Search more judgments