✦ Allahabad High Court · 29 Apr 2025

Gaurav Shukla & Anr. v. State of U.P & Anr.

No. 43819 of 2024DEEPAK VERMA3 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Remanded

The matter is remanded back to the concerned learned

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. Accordingly, the impugned cognizance/summoning order dated 11.01.2022 passed in case no. 145130 of 2022, arising out of case crime no. 126 of 2021, u/s 188, 269, 270, 271, 147, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Kakadev, District Kanpur Nagar, pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate 2nd…
  • Para 88. The matter is remanded back to the concerned learned Magistrate with direction that learned Magistrate shall pass an appropriate order, applying his judicial mind, within a month from the date of production of certified copy of this order, considering the material facts, in accordance…
  • Para 99. With aforesaid direction, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 29.4.2025 Nitin Verma NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Judgment

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2.

The present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with prayer to quash the charge sheet no. 228 of 2021 dated 22.10.2021 in case crime no. 126 of 2021 u/s 188, 269, 270, 271, 147, 323, 504, 506 IPC P.S. Kakadev, District Kanpur Nagar, and to quash the cognizance/summoning order dated 11.01.2022 issued by the Metropolitan Magistrate 2nd, Kanpur Nagar and to quash the entire proceedings of the case no. 145130 of 2022 (State Vs Gaurav Shukla and others), pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate 2nd, Kanpur Nagar.

3.

Instant FIR has been lodged with allegation that the opposite party no.2 and one-Taufik Khan were working in the construction of the Guru Dev Metro station. On 30.04.2021 at about 04:00 p.m. when they were going for work of metro towards Rawatpur station then some local persons, who were sitting at Vikram Service center on the opposite side of road, called them and when they have denied to come from the opposite side of the road then they have reached near the opposite party no.2 and Taufik khan then assaulted them and abused and one of them showing pistol said that they have broken their shop and houses and after inquiry it was found that the said person are applicants, Divya Shukla and 3- 4 other persons, hence, the present FIR has been lodged.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. I.O. after conducting investigation, submitted charge sheet against two accused persons/applicants, U/s 188, 269, 270, 271, 147, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. I.O., in arbitrary manner. The inquiry conducted and charge sheet submitted U/s 147 I.P.C. by I.O. is without taking into consideration the necessary ingredients for Section 147 I.P.C. The necessary ingredient for summoning the person, under Section 146/147 I.P.C. is that force or violence is used by unlawful assembly and unlawful assembly is defined in Section 141 I.P.C. that an assembly of five or more persons is designated as unlawful assembly. An unlawful assembly consists of five or more persons who have a common intention to commit an offense and the assembly must use force or violence, this can include physical aggression against persons or property. He further submitted that learned Magistrate, after getting charge sheet, has summoned the applicants U/s 147 I.P.C., without application of judicial mind, whereas the charge sheet has been submitted against two persons.

5.

Learned AGA vehemently opposed the submissions raised by applicant's counsel but could not dispute the legal aspects of the matter.

6.

Considering the argument raised by counsel for the applicants and learned AGA as well as from the record it is apparent that charge sheet has been submitted against two persons and learned Magistrate, without applying his judicial mind and without going into merits of the case, summoned the applicants U/s 147 I.P.C. From the record, it is clear that only two persons have been charge sheeted, thereof, there is no evidence to summon the applicants under Section 146/147 I.P.C. Argument raised by counsel having force.

7.

Accordingly, the impugned cognizance/summoning order dated 11.01.2022 passed in case no. 145130 of 2022, arising out of case crime no. 126 of 2021, u/s 188, 269, 270, 271, 147, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Kakadev, District Kanpur Nagar, pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate 2nd, Kanpur Nagar, is hereby, quashed.

Operative part

8.

The matter is remanded back to the concerned learned Magistrate with direction that learned Magistrate shall pass an appropriate order, applying his judicial mind, within a month from the date of production of certified copy of this order, considering the material facts, in accordance with law.

9.

With aforesaid direction, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 29.4.2025 Nitin Verma NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The matter is remanded back to the concerned learned

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 141, 146, 147, 188, 269, 270, 271, 323, 504, 506.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 29 Apr 2025. The bench was DEEPAK VERMA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 43819 of 2024). ← Search more judgments