✦ Allahabad High Court

Taufique Ahmad v. Jagdish Prasad & Anr.

No. 12714 of 2025MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, PASS, DIRECT CIVIL

Case at a glance

Bench
MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, PASS, DIRECT CIVIL

Outcome

Disposed of

In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) court no-17, Prayagraj, to decide the above- mentioned application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks from the date of production of…

Judgment

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

2.

This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "Pass an order to direct the Civil Judge (Senior Division) court no-17, Prayagraj, to decide the interim injunction application (6c) as well as original Suit no-105/2021 Sailesh Kumar Srivastava and another Vs Jagdish Prasad, within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble court"

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above-mentioned application 6C is pending consideration since 2021 and the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.

4.

Since the above-mentioned application is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.

Operative part

5.

In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) court no-17, Prayagraj, to decide the above- mentioned application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. October 17, 2025 Rishabh (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 12714 of 2025). ← Search more judgments