BNSS No. 36167 of 2025 · Allahabad High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SANJIV KUMAR
Outcome
Disposed of
With above directions this application stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 528
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ss. 303(2), 317(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. With above directions this application stands disposed of. May 5, 2026 Subham (Sanjiv Kumar,J.) SUBHAM KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Judgment
Kumar Pandey and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 187 of 2024, under Section 303(2), 317(2) BNS, Police Station Kandharapur, District Azamgarh.
After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicants submit that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to move discharge application and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.
Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.
In view of above, it is provided that the applicants are permitted to move their discharge application within four weeks' from today and in case any such application is filed, same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order. 2 NA528 No. 36167 of 2025
Operative part
With above directions this application stands disposed of. May 5, 2026 Subham (Sanjiv Kumar,J.) SUBHAM KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With above directions this application stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 303(2), 317(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.