✦ Allahabad High Court

Ram Avadh v. State Of U.P. And 15 Others

AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. 3716 of 2025CHANDRA KUMAR RAI

Case at a glance

Bench
CHANDRA KUMAR RAI

Outcome

Disposed of

of the case, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally directing

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. Considering the facts mentioned in the report dated 23.9.2025 sent by the learned Member, Board of Revenue and the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally directing respondent no.2 to decide the Revision bearing Case No.REV/ 3186…

Judgment

1.

Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Upendra Nath, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State- respondents and Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent- Gaon Sabha.

2.

The instant petition has been filed for the following relief: " issue a writ, order or direction on the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the Hon'ble Board of Revenue, U.P. at Prayagraj, through its Member (respondent no.2) to decide the Revision bearing Case No.REV/ 3186 / 2022, Computerized Case No.AL20221506003186 (Ram Avadh vs. Harihar and others), under Section 333 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 pending before the Board of Revenue, U.P. at Prayagraj within stipulated period of time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. "

3.

This Court vide order dated 15.9.2025 directed the learned Member, Board of Revenue to submit a report in the matter.

4.

In compliance of the order of this Court dated 15.9.2025, the report dated 23.9.2025 has been submitted by the learned Member, Board of Revenue, which is already on record.

5.

Mr. Upendra Nath, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State on the basis of report dated 23.9.2025 submitted that the aforementioned pending revision shall be decided expeditiously. 2 WRIB No. 3716 of 2025

Operative part

6.

Considering the facts mentioned in the report dated 23.9.2025 sent by the learned Member, Board of Revenue and the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally directing respondent no.2 to decide the Revision bearing Case No.REV/ 3186 / 2022, Computerized Case No.AL20221506003186 (Ram Avadh vs. Harihar and others), under Section 333 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 in accordance with law after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties, expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. September 24, 2025 Rameez (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: of the case, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally directing

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 — s. 333.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. 3716 of 2025). ← Search more judgments