AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. 31925 of 2025 · Allahabad High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Outcome
Disposed of
With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 s. 210
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
Judgment
It is contended that a restoration application along with delay condonation application is pending consideration before the rspondent no. 2 in revision filed under Section 210 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, against the order of mutation. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the restoration application dated 4.7.2025.
As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent No. 2 to decide the restoration application along with delay condonation application dated 04.07.2025, filed by petitioner, in Computerized Case No.C-20070500001, Case No. 117/100/2007-2008 (Suit Versus Jhakari), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Operative part
With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 12, 2025/Shekhar (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 — s. 210.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.