Siddharth Gautam v. Prabuddh Gautam And 6 Others
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. XXXIX r. 1
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gautam Buddh Nagar to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from…
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " 1. Direct the Trial Court/ Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gautam Buddh Nagar to decide the temporary injunction application dated 10.09.2021 (Application-6C) pending in Original Suit No. 686 of 2021 Siddharth Gautam Vs. Prabuddh Gautam and others, before the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gautam Buddh Nagar, within specific period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. "
Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2021 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
Operative part
Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gautam Buddh Nagar to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity 2 A227 No. 10713 of 2025 of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 10, 2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XXXIX r. 1.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.