Smt Muskan v. Ankit And 3 Others
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 23 Oct 2024
- Neutral citation
- 2024:AHC:170059
Outcome
Disposed of
With the aforesaid directions, the application is disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed to direct the Court below to decide the Complaint Case No. 1386 of 2023 (Smt. Muskan Vs. Ankit and others) filed under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, pending before the Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C. Crime Against Women, District-Moradabad. Expeditious disposal of a case is the right of every litigant and it is expected from every Court to endeavour to dispose of a case pending before it, expeditiously. Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection in this regard. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is expedient to direct the court concerned to make its endeavour to decide the aforesaid case as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 60 days, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, in accordance with law, if there is no other legal impediment. With the aforesaid directions, the application is disposed of. Order Date :- 23.10.2024 Shivani
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the aforesaid directions, the application is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 529; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 483; Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — s. 12.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 23 Oct 2024.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.