✦ Allahabad High Court

Nand Kishore And 4 Others v. Rajneesh Tripathi

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 19311 of 2025SALIL KUMAR RAI, ZAFEER AHMAD

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall not

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

The present writ petition has been filed challenging the First Information Report dated 16.08.2025 registering Case Crime No. 359 of 2025, under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 351(3), 352 B.N.S., Police Station Kurawali, District Mainpuri. It has been argued by the counsel for the petitioners that no offence under Section 109(1) BNS is made out from the recitals made in the first information report as well as from the injury report which has been annexed with the supplementary affidavit. For the other offences referred in the said first information report, punishment is imprisonment for less than seven years. The AGA representing respondent nos.1 to 3 has opposed the writ petition. After considering the rival submission of the parties and the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall not be arrested in pursuance to the First Information Report dated 16.08.2025 registering Case Crime No. 359 of 2025, under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 351(3), 352 B.N.S., Police Station Kurawali, District Mainpuri till submission of police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C./ Section 193(3) B.N.S.S. September 1, 2025 AS (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Salil Kumar Rai,J.) ABHISHEK SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall not

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(3), 352; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 173(2); Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 193(3).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 19311 of 2025). ← Search more judgments