Jageshwar Dayal And 5 Others v. Sharma
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
writ petition is dismissed as not pressed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. September 4, 2025 Anil (Arun Kumar,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Judgment
Sri S.M. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for dismissal of the writ petition as not pressed.
Learned Standing Counsel has placed on record the instructions received from the respondents, according to which the subject land is Government land and FIR No.325 dated 26.8.2025 has been registered against the petitioners, on the basis of complaint made by Revenue Department. It is also stated that a notice under the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 has been issued against the petitioners.
Operative part
In view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. September 4, 2025 Anil (Arun Kumar,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: writ petition is dismissed as not pressed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.