Krishnamani Tiwari v. Surendra Kumar @ Viskhopra And 6 Others
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. 39 r. 1
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahar, District Jaunpur to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from…
Judgment
#1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
#2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following reliefs: "1. Pass an Order, directing the directing Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahar, District Jaunpur to decide the Application 6C in the Original Suit No. 742 of 2024 [Krishnamani Tiwari Vs. Surendra Kumar and Others] pending in the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahar, District Jaunpur within a stipulated period of time as prescribed by this Hon'ble Court; ii. Pass an Order, directing the directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahar, District Jaunpur to decide the Original Suit No. 742 of 2024 [Krishnamani Tiwari Vs. Surendra Kumar and Others] pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahar, District Jaunpur on merits within a stipulated period of time as prescribed by this Hon'ble Court;"
#3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
#4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
#5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahar, District Jaunpur to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 12.8.2025 Nitika Sri. NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 39 r. 1.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 12 Aug 2025. The bench was CIVIL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.