✦ Allahabad High Court · 31 Jul 2025

Committee Of Management Sri Sundar Lal Purva v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others

WRIT - C No. 25205 of 2025CHANDRA DHARI SINGH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

petition is disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 31.7.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Judgment

Petitioner :- Committee Of Management Sri Sundar Lal Purva Madhyamik Vidyalaya And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhakar Awasthi, Roma Seth Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.

1.

The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following reliefs:- " i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Prescribed Authority, respondent no.2 to decide pending reference in terms of Section 25 (1) within shortest period of time which may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court in exercise of extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. "

2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners submitted that reference in terms of Section 25 (1) of the Societies Registration Act is pending before respondent no. 2-Prescribed Authority but even notice has not been issued in the said reference. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner prayed that authority concerned may be directed to decide the said reference expeditiously in time bound manner.

3.

Per contra, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondents has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners.

4.

Heard Sri Saurabh Tripathi holding brief of Sri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners and Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition.

5.

Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. The respondent no.2 is directed to decide the aforesaid pending reference in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Operative part

6.

With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 31.7.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226; Registration Act, 1908.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 31 Jul 2025. The bench was CHANDRA DHARI SINGH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WRIT - C No. 25205 of 2025). ← Search more judgments