✦ Allahabad High Court · 22 Aug 2025

Hari Mohan & Anr. v. State of U.P & Anr.

BNSS No. 25801 of 2025SAURABH SRIVASTAVA3 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
22 Aug 2025
Bench
SAURABH SRIVASTAVA
Neutral citation
2025:AHC:145349

Key paragraphs

  • Para 1010. Accordingly, the application filed by the applicants under Section 528 BNSS is allowed accordingly. RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Order Date :- 22.8.2025 Rakesh

Judgment

Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

1.

Heard Sri Dhirendra Pratap Singh learned counsel for applicant, Sri Anjani Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for State.

2.

Present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C has been preferred with a prayer to allow the instant application and quash the impugned summoning order dated 14.10.2019 passed by Chief Judicial magistrate, Gorakhpur as well as the further proceeding of Case No.12205 of 2019 arising out of Case Crime No.325 of 2019 under Sections 193, 419, 468, 34 IPC and 66D of the I.T. Act, Police Station Chauri Chaura, District Gorakhpur pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gorakhpur in terms of compromise entered between the parties.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.2 jointly submits that on the request of parties the matter was referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court and by the efforts of mediator the mediation has been successful and it has been stipulated by the parties that they will withdraw all the pending cases filed against each other including the case connected with the instant petition and all the disputes have been settled in terms of the agreement.

4.

It is also stipulated that the case filed by either parties against each other shall be deemed to have been decided in the light of the present settlement. The parties are not having any further claims or demands against each other and all the disputes and differences in this regard have been amicably settled by the parties.

5.

Highlighting the report of the Mediation Centre which has been placed on record and is also appended along with order sheet, it is submitted that proceedings of the instant case pending before the court below should be quashed. It is also admitted by learned counsel for opposite party no.2 that the terms of settlement have been complied by the parties and opposite party no.2 is not having any objection, if on the basis of settlement, case pending before trial court be quashed.

6.

Learned AGA would have no objection if dispute between the parties is settled through the course of mediation.

7.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, it is evident that with regard to the above mentioned case pending before learned court concerned in shape of Case Crime no. 325 of 2019, the instant application was moved by the applicants. However, the matter was referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court and the efforts of the mediator has resulted in amicable settlement between the parties. A settlement has been placed before this Court by the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Allahabad High Court (appended to the order sheet) wherein the terms and conditions of the settlement has been enumerated and it is categorically stated that the parties have settled the dispute and they do not want to prosecute each other and thus the prayer has been made by learned counsel for the applicants as well as opposite party no.2 to quash the proceedings pending before the court below.

8.

Since the mediation has been successful and report has been sent along with original settlement executed between the parties, thus in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in (2012)10 SCC 303, Shiji and others Vs. Radhika and others 2012 AIR SC 499, Manoj Sharma Vs. State of U.P. (2008)16 SCC1, entire proceedings of above mentioned Case no. 12205/2019 (Hari Mohan and another vs. State of U.P.) arising out of Case Crime no. 325 of 2019 under sections 193, 419, 468, 34 IPC and 66D of the I.T. Act, Police Station Chauri Chaura, District Gorakhpur, are hereby quashed and set aside only in respect of applicants herein.

9.

The settlement report of the Medication and Conciliation Centre shall be part and parcel of this order.

10.

Accordingly, the application filed by the applicants under Section 528 BNSS is allowed accordingly. RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Order Date :- 22.8.2025 Rakesh

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 193, 419, 468.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 22 Aug 2025. The bench was SAURABH SRIVASTAVA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. BNSS No. 25801 of 2025). ← Search more judgments