✦ Allahabad High Court · 17 Jul 2025

Gufran Khan v. Union Of India And 6 Others

WRIT - C No. 22839 of 2025CHANDRA DHARI SINGH2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The writ petition is disposed of, accordingly

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. The writ petition is disposed of, accordingly. Order Date :- 17.7.2025 Radhika (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Judgment

3.

Sri Shashank Shekhar Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos.2 to 6 vehemently opposed the petition but has no objection on innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

4.

Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 2 to 6. The petitioner is directed to approach the appellate authority i.e. Executive Council under Section 36B of the Aligarh Muslim University Act, 1920 by way of filing an appeal within one week from today. In case such appeal is filed, the Executive Council is directed to pass a detailed and reasoned order on the same, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the affected parties, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks thereafter.

Operative part

5.

The writ petition is disposed of, accordingly. Order Date :- 17.7.2025 Radhika (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of, accordingly

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 17 Jul 2025. The bench was CHANDRA DHARI SINGH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WRIT - C No. 22839 of 2025). ← Search more judgments