Bijendra Singh v. The State Of Up Through Principal Secretary
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of above, the present application is dismissed as not
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 528
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 452, 506
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 424
Judgment
Sri Chandan Bhagat, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Vijay Kumar Mishra, learned Brief Holder for the State are present. The present application u/s 528 BNSS has been filed with prayer to quash the order dated 18.6.2025 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Division) / Judicial Magistrate, Hapur in Complaint Case No. 1624 of 2020, under Sections 452 and 506 of IPC, P.S. Hafijpur, District Hapur, as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 18.6.2025, pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Division) / Judicial Magistrate, Hapur. Learned counsel for the applicant fairly admits that application under Section 424 Cr.P.C. has been filed two and half years of statement of complainant. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants does not want to press the present application. In view of above, the present application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. Certified copies of the relevant documents be returned to learned counsel for the applicants after retaining a photocopy of the same. Order Date :- 22.7.2025 Akram MOHAMMAD AKRAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of above, the present application is dismissed as not
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 452, 506; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 424.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 22 Jul 2025. The bench was ADDITIONAL CIVIL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.