Brijendra Pratap Singh v. Sanjay Kuma
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. 39 r. 1
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahar, Jaunpur to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date…
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
The instant petition has been filed for following relief: "(A) Issue an order or direction in suitable nature directing learned court i.e. Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahar, Jaunpur to decide the 6-C application dated 22.03.2023 pending in Case No. 1027 of 2022 (Brijendra Versus Sanjay) expeditiously, preferably within a specific time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, if, possible on the next date of hearing. "
Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2023 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
Operative part
Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahar, Jaunpur to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 39 r. 1.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 16 Jul 2025. The bench was MANISH KUMAR NIGAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.