Arvind Chauhan v. Chandu Chauhan
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With these observation, this petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 s. 13
Key paragraphs
- Para 88. With these observation, this petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Judgment
#1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
#2. The writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "i. Issue an order or direction for Family Judge/Family Court 3rd Jaunpur to decide the divorce suit no.. 261/2024 (Arvind Chauhan Vs Chandu Chauhan), witin some specific/earlist time period."
#3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the proceedings under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act are pending since 2024. It has been further contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that appropriate directions be issued to the Family Judge, Family Court 3rd Jaunpur seized with the proceedings of divorce u/s 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act to decide the same within a stipulated time or in a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.
#4. Learned counsel for the petitioner brought attention of the Court to the provision of Section 21-B of the Hindu Marriage Act which contemplates to conclude the trial within six months from the date of service of notice of petition on the respondents.
#5. Section 21-B of the Hindu Marriage Act is quoted as under: "21-B. Special provision relating to trial and disposal of petitions under the Act.-(1) The trial of a petition under this Act shall, so far as is practicable consistently with the interest of justice in respect of the trial, be continued from day to day until its conclusion unless the Court finds the adjournment of the trial beyond the following day to be necessary for reasons to be recorded. (2) Every petition under this Act shall be tried as expeditiously as possible and endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of service of notice of the petition on the respondent. (3) Every appeal under this Act shall be tried as expeditiously as possible, and endeavour shall be made to conclude the hearing within three months from the date of service of notice of appeal on the respondent."
#6. In view of the statutory requirement as contemplated under Section 21-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
#7. The Family Judge, Family Court 3rd Jaunpur is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid pending proceeding before him, in accordance with law, expeditiously, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned as well as an opportunity to lead evidence in support of their case and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment, keeping in view the statutory mandate of Section 21-B of the Hindu Marriage Act quoted above.
#8. With these observation, this petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With these observation, this petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — s. 13.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 08 Jul 2025. The bench was ISSUE, FAMILY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.