Yogesh Kumar Saukand And 2 Others v. State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy available in law. May 12, 2026 Kuldeep (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Judgment
: Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Shailesh Counsel for Respondent(s) Kumar Srivastava : C.S.C., Santosh Kumar Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the State.
Petitioners by means of the present writ petition have prayed for the following reliefs: "(a) to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent nos.2 to 5 not to evict to the Petitioners from their possession pertaining to the arazi Nos. 113, 114, 115, 116 and 117 situated at Village Raipur Tappa Nagal, Pargana and Tehsil Sadar Bijnor, District Bijnor without any legal order; (b) to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent nos.2 to 5 not to take any coercive action against the Petitioners; (c) to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent concern to take legal action against the Respondent no.6/. Satyanarayan Bhatnagar in the instant matter forthwith in the interest of justice;
The dispute is essentially a private dispute between the petitioner and the private respondent No.6.
Since the dispute is a private dispute between the petitioner and the private respondent No.6, therefore, the present writ petition is not the proper remedy as this Court cannot issue direction against a private person under Article 226 of the Constitution. 2 WRIC No. 18557 of 2026
Operative part
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy available in law. May 12, 2026 Kuldeep (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.