Alok Prajapati v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
Let the applicant be released on bail on his
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 363, 376DA, 457, 506
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 ss. 5, 6
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 161, 164, 313
- Constitution of India art. 21
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Alok Prajapati, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 127 of 2022, under Sections 363,376DA,457,506 IPC and section 5/6 POCSO Act Police Station Dokati, District- Ballia, during pendency of trial. There are allegations against the applicant of abduction of minor girl, commission of rape, extending threat besides commission of offence under sections 5/6 POCSO Act. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that neither in the First Information Report nor in the statement of the victim applicant has been named. He has been implicated for the first time in the statement of the victim under section 164 Cr.P.C. along with other co- accused, Sanjay Singh, Rajiv, Mannu Yadav and Chandan Singh. It is further submitted that victim in her statement under section 161 Cr.P.C. made allegation only against Sanjay Singh.
Applicant has been falsely implicated in this case on account of village politics. As per report of the radiologist age of the victim is above 16 years. Given margin of two years on higher side, she can be considered to be major. Medical report of victim does not supports the prosecution case. The applicant is in jail since 28.11.2022 and has no criminal history. co-accused, Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused; submissions of the learned counsel for the parties noted above; finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant; keeping view the uncertainty regarding conclusion of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; applicant being under-trial having fundamental right to speedy trial; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India; considering the dictum of Apex Court in the recent judgment dated 11.07.2022 of the Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs.
Operative part
C.B.I., passed in S.L.P (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021; considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by the under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed Let the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
That the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police ofÏcer;
The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law to ensure presence of the applicant.
The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufÏcient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 9.2.2023 Atul kr. sri. ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Let the applicant be released on bail on his
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 363, 376DA, 457, 506; Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — ss. 5, 6; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 161, 164, 313; Constitution of India — art. 21.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 09 Feb 2023. The bench was SIDDHARTH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.