Amar Nath Yadav v. Bhairav Nath Yadav And 3 Others
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 19 May 2025
- Bench
- ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
- Neutral citation
- 2025:AHC:83750
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed.
Judgment
Even in the revised call no one has appeared on behalf of petitioner to press the writ petition, however, Sri Alok Kumar Yadav, learned counsel, is present for the respondents.
It is a case where the plaintiff respondent no. 1 had instituted a civil suit in which an application for grant of temporary injunction was moved, which was allowed by the trial court. Aggrieved defendant petitioner had filed a misc. civil appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1 (d) CPC, which was also dismissed.
I have heard learned counsel for respondents and perused the material on record. No case is made out for interfering with the interim injunction order granted by trial court and affirmed by the appellate court.
Writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged. Order Date :- 19.5.2025 Shekhar SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 19 May 2025. The bench was ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.