Jai Hanuman Rice Mill v. U.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission Lucknow
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 15 May 2025
- Neutral citation
- 2025:AHC:80440-DB
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. Heard Sri Arun Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Narendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 3. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner has sought a direction to the respondent No. 2, the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Allahabad, through its Chairman/Chief Engineer (D), Allahabad, to decide the Complaint of the petitioner filed before the aforesaid respondent on April, 19, 2025, within a stipulated time period. Having regard to the aforesaid prayer, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2, to decide the complaint of the petitioner, by a reasoned order, within a period of ten weeks from date, after granting proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Order Date :- 15.5.2025 Arun K. Singh [Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.] [Shekhar B. Saraf, J.] ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 15 May 2025.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.