Hemant Kumar Tiwari & Anr. v. State Of U.P & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The application stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 147, 188, 308, 323, 504
- Disaster Management Act, 2005 s. 51
- Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 s. 3
Judgment
Operative part
of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, arising out of Case Crime No. 225 of 2021, Police Station Itwa, District Siddharthnagar, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siddharthnagar, with a further prayer to stay the proceedings of the aforesaid case. At the very outset, counsel for the applicants states that the applicants will surrender before the court below and apply for bail. It is therefore, directed that in case the applicants surrender and prefer bail application before the court below, it will decide the said bail application as expeditiously as possible, preferably within 15 days from today. It is further provided that while deciding the bail application of the applicants, the court below will take into account the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation And Another passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5191 of 2021 on 07.10.2021 and decide it in accordance with law. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 16.2.2022 Arun K. Singh SINGH Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 147, 188, 308, 323, 504; Disaster Management Act, 2005 — s. 51; Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 — s. 3.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 16 Feb 2022. The bench was BRI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.