Siyaram v. State Of U P And 3 Others
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 18 Oct 2022
Outcome
Dismissed
The petition is dismissed accordingly
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Petitioner :- Siyaram Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepak Singh, Navin Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Gopal Krishna Pandey Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J. The instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondent to abide by the order of interim injunction dated 19.12.2020, passed by Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Jhansi in O.S. No. 556 of 2020 (Siyaram vs. Nagar Nigam & Others). We are of considered opinion that the relief claimed is wholly misconceived, inasmuch as, the procedure for getting the order of injunction implemented, is provided under the Code of Civil Procedure itself. We, in exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution, decline to entertain such a relief. The petition is dismissed accordingly. (Jayant Banerji, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 18.10.2022 Jaideep/- BANERJEE Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is dismissed accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 18 Oct 2022.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.