Shafiqan v. Aslam And 5 Others
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 03 Nov 2022
- Bench
- VIVEK CHAUDHARY
Outcome
Dismissed
The petition stands dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
Operative part
The petitioner by means of present petition has challenged order dated 14.09.2021 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Garhmukteshwar, District Hapur in Original Suit No. 130 of 2020 whereby he has allowed the amendment application of the plaintiffs-respondents, as well as order dated 05.05.2022 passed by the learned District Judge, Hapur rejecting the revision filed against the said amendment application. It appears from the record that plaintiffs-respondents filed the suit in the year 2020, wherein an amendment application was filed by them that they came across a registered will with regard to property in dispute executed in the year 2000. Therefore, they prayed to bring necessary pleadings with regard to said fact. The amendment application was allowed by the trial court. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length and perused the record. I do not find any illegality in the orders impugned passed by the courts below and not inclined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 3.11.2022 DS (Vivek Chaudhary,J.) SINGH Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition stands dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 03 Nov 2022. The bench was VIVEK CHAUDHARY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.