Manoj Kumar v. Kuldeep Singh and others), under Sections

Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.

1. Sri Harshit Pratap Singh, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2 today, which is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Harshit Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the material on record.

3. The parties before this Court had made a request that they have entered into a compromise in this matter and have settled all the disputes between them and now they do not want to proceed with this matter.

4. A perusal of record shows that by way of present criminal appeal legality and validity of the summoning order dated 19.02.2024 was assailed by the appellants whereby the appellants were summoned to face trial by the learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, Jalaun at Orai in Complaint Case No. 86 of 2023 (Manoj Kumar Vs. Kuldeep Singh and others), under Sections 323, 504 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(r)(s) SC/ST Act, Police Station Rendhar, District Jalaun.

5. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the compromise entered into between the parties has been made without any coercion or undue influence upon the complainant of this case and is a result of free will and consent of the parties.

6. The coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.08.2025 directed the learned trial court to verify the compromise deed and after due verification submit its report to this Court. Learned trial court was also directed vide order of this Court dated 20.05.2025 to submit fresh report regarding financial aid granted to the complainant by the Government and after verifying the same from the District Social Welfare Officer, Jalaun, submit its report to this Court.

7. In compliance of the orders dated 05.08.2024 and 20.05.2025 passed by this Court, learned trial court submitted its verification reports dated 23.08.2024 and 02.07.2025 wherein it has been mentioned that the court proceeded to verify the compromise deed and ensured that financial aid has not been provided to the complainant by the Government.

8. It appears from perusal of the record that the present case is having a nature of purely private dispute and prima facie it also appears that the alleged offence has not been committed on account of the caste of the victim and except some offence under SC/ST Act, minor offences have been levelled against the accused. Further, the compromise between the parties is the result of free will and consent of the informant-opposite party no. 2 without any undue influence.

9. Whether a compromise can be verified and accepted in a case relating to an offence under SC/ST Act has been answered in Ramawatar Vs. State of M.P. (2022) 13 SCC 635. Paragraph no. 17 of the said judgment is quoted herein below:- "17. On the other hand, where it appears to the Court that the offence in question, although covered under the SC/ST Act, is primarily private or civil in nature, or where the alleged offence has not been committed on account of the caste of the victim, or where the continuation of the legal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, the Court can exercise its powers to quash the proceedings. On similar lines, when considering a prayer for quashing on the basis of a compromise/settlement, if the Court is satisfied that the underlying objective of the Act would not be contravened or diminished even if the felony in question goes unpunished, the mere fact that the offence is covered under a "special statute" would not refrain this Court or the High Court, from exercising their respective powers under Article 142 of the Constitution or Section 482 Cr.P.C."

10. It is further held in paragraph no. 19 of the said judgment which is quoted herein under:- "19. We may hasten to add that in cases such as the present, the Courts ought to be even more vigilant to ensure that the complainant-victim has entered into the compromise on the volition of his/her free will and not on account of any duress. It cannot be understated that since members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe belong to the weaker sections of our country, they are more prone to acts of coercion, and therefore ought to be accorded a higher level of protection. If the Courts find even a hint of compulsion or force, no relief can be given to the accused party. What factors the Courts should consider, would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case"

11. A perusal of the full Bench judgment in Ghulam Rasool Khan And Others vs State Of U.P And Another 2022 (8) ADJ 691 reveals that a matter under the SC/ST Act may be compounded in a criminal appeal under section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act and there is no need to take recourse of U/s. 482 Cr.P.C. for the same.

12. In view of that, this Court finds that since the parties have entered into compromise which has already been verified by the trial court and the compensation amount received by the informant from the Government has already been deposited in the Treasury, now nothing rests in this matter to continue.

13. Hence, the summoning order dated 19.02.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, Jalaun at Orai in Complaint Case No. 86 of 2023 (Manoj Kumar Vs. Kuldeep Singh and others), under Sections 323, 504 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(r)(s) SC/ST Act, Police Station Rendhar, District Jalaun as well as entire proceedings are set aside and quashed and the present criminal appeal is disposed of in terms of compromise entered into by both the parties. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Rmk. RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.

1. Sri Harshit Pratap Singh, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2 today, which is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Harshit Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the material on record.

3. The parties before this Court had made a request that they have entered into a compromise in this matter and have settled all the disputes between them and now they do not want to proceed with this matter.

4. A perusal of record shows that by way of present criminal appeal legality and validity of the summoning order dated 19.02.2024 was assailed by the appellants whereby the appellants were summoned to face trial by the learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, Jalaun at Orai in Complaint Case No. 86 of 2023 (Manoj Kumar Vs. Kuldeep Singh and others), under Sections 323, 504 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(r)(s) SC/ST Act, Police Station Rendhar, District Jalaun.

5. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the compromise entered into between the parties has been made without any coercion or undue influence upon the complainant of this case and is a result of free will and consent of the parties.

6. The coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.08.2025 directed the learned trial court to verify the compromise deed and after due verification submit its report to this Court. Learned trial court was also directed vide order of this Court dated 20.05.2025 to submit fresh report regarding financial aid granted to the complainant by the Government and after verifying the same from the District Social Welfare Officer, Jalaun, submit its report to this Court.

7. In compliance of the orders dated 05.08.2024 and 20.05.2025 passed by this Court, learned trial court submitted its verification reports dated 23.08.2024 and 02.07.2025 wherein it has been mentioned that the court proceeded to verify the compromise deed and ensured that financial aid has not been provided to the complainant by the Government.

8. It appears from perusal of the record that the present case is having a nature of purely private dispute and prima facie it also appears that the alleged offence has not been committed on account of the caste of the victim and except some offence under SC/ST Act, minor offences have been levelled against the accused. Further, the compromise between the parties is the result of free will and consent of the informant-opposite party no. 2 without any undue influence.

9. Whether a compromise can be verified and accepted in a case relating to an offence under SC/ST Act has been answered in Ramawatar Vs. State of M.P. (2022) 13 SCC 635. Paragraph no. 17 of the said judgment is quoted herein below:- "17. On the other hand, where it appears to the Court that the offence in question, although covered under the SC/ST Act, is primarily private or civil in nature, or where the alleged offence has not been committed on account of the caste of the victim, or where the continuation of the legal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, the Court can exercise its powers to quash the proceedings. On similar lines, when considering a prayer for quashing on the basis of a compromise/settlement, if the Court is satisfied that the underlying objective of the Act would not be contravened or diminished even if the felony in question goes unpunished, the mere fact that the offence is covered under a "special statute" would not refrain this Court or the High Court, from exercising their respective powers under Article 142 of the Constitution or Section 482 Cr.P.C."

10. It is further held in paragraph no. 19 of the said judgment which is quoted herein under:- "19. We may hasten to add that in cases such as the present, the Courts ought to be even more vigilant to ensure that the complainant-victim has entered into the compromise on the volition of his/her free will and not on account of any duress. It cannot be understated that since members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe belong to the weaker sections of our country, they are more prone to acts of coercion, and therefore ought to be accorded a higher level of protection. If the Courts find even a hint of compulsion or force, no relief can be given to the accused party. What factors the Courts should consider, would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case"

11. A perusal of the full Bench judgment in Ghulam Rasool Khan And Others vs State Of U.P And Another 2022 (8) ADJ 691 reveals that a matter under the SC/ST Act may be compounded in a criminal appeal under section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act and there is no need to take recourse of U/s. 482 Cr.P.C. for the same.

12. In view of that, this Court finds that since the parties have entered into compromise which has already been verified by the trial court and the compensation amount received by the informant from the Government has already been deposited in the Treasury, now nothing rests in this matter to continue.

13. Hence, the summoning order dated 19.02.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, Jalaun at Orai in Complaint Case No. 86 of 2023 (Manoj Kumar Vs. Kuldeep Singh and others), under Sections 323, 504 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(r)(s) SC/ST Act, Police Station Rendhar, District Jalaun as well as entire proceedings are set aside and quashed and the present criminal appeal is disposed of in terms of compromise entered into by both the parties. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Rmk. RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad