Ankit Jain v. State of U.P & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the above, the present application is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, it is provided that the parties shall appear before the court below along with a certified copy of this order on the next date fixed. It is therefore expected that the trial court may fix a date for the verification of the compromise…
- Para 66. In view of the above, the present application is disposed of.
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the applicants; Sri Som Veer, Advocate who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State.
The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 22.07.2018; cognizance order dated 04.04.2019 in Case No.144 of 2019 (State Vs. Ankit Jain) arising out of Case Crime No.186 of 2018 under Sections 504, 506 I.P.C. and 67 I.T. Act, P.S. Nidhauli Kalan, District Etah, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalesar Etah.
It has been contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicant no. 1 and opposite party no. 2 have amicably settled their dispute out of the court and entered into a compromise. A copy of the compromise deed entered into between the parties has been annexed as Annexure no. 4 to the present application, hence the proceeding against the applicants be quashed.
Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute the correctness of the facts.
Accordingly, it is provided that the parties shall appear before the court below along with a certified copy of this order on the next date fixed. It is therefore expected that the trial court may fix a date for the verification of the compromise entered into between the parties and pass an appropriate order to that effect within next four weeks. It shall be open to the applicants to file a fresh application U/S 482 at that stage for the relief sought herein.
Operative part
In view of the above, the present application is disposed of.
For a period of four weeks, no coercive measure shall be taken against the applicants. Order Date :- 4.8.2023 Meenu Singh MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the present application is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 504, 506.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 04 Aug 2023. The bench was DEEPAK VERMA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.