Shri Kant v. State of U.P & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 01 Nov 2022
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 323, 376, 506
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Petitioner :- Shri Kant Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Ratan Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel. The present petition has been filed challenging the suspension order dated 16.11.2021. On perusal of the suspension order, it is revealed that the same has been passed on the basis of the criminal case lodged against the petitioner being Case Crime No.441 of 2021 under sections 376, 323, 506 IPC. I do not see any reason to interfere with the said order in exercise of the power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition lacks merit and dismissed. It is provided that in case the proceedings are not concluded against the petitioner within a reasonable time, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail his remedies afresh. Order Date :- 1.11.2022 VNP/- PRASAD SHUKLA Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 323, 376, 506; Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 01 Nov 2022.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.