Ramu Kushwaha v. State of U.P & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The application stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ss. 193(3), 482
- Animal Cruelty Act
Key paragraphs
- Para 1111. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 10.4.2025 SKT/- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State- opposite parties, and perused the material placed on record.
This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 51 of 2025, under Sections 3/5A/8 U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 and 11 Animal Cruelty Act, Police Station Bariyarpur, District Deoria.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. False recovery of livestock has been shown from the alleged vehicle. There is no independent witness to the alleged recovery. At this stage there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that the investigation is going on and the applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report.
Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant and, in particular, the fact that there is no independent witness to the alleged recovery; and, at this stage there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report.
In the event of arrest, the applicant- Ramu Kushwaha be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193(3) B.N.S.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.
In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.
The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant.
The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.
Operative part
The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 10.4.2025 SKT/- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 193(3), 482; Animal Cruelty Act.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 10 Apr 2025. The bench was VIVEK VARMA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.