Phool Chandra Yadav v. List revised
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
As prayed, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. As prayed, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. March 19, 2026 AS Rathore (Samit Gopal,J.)
Judgment
Heard Sri Vagish Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anil Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State and perused the material on record.
The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner- Phool Chandra Yadav, with the prayer to issue, an order or direction setting aside the impugned judgment and order dated 11.02.2026 passed by Court of Sessions Judge, Jaunpur in Criminal Appeal No. 81 of 2025 (under section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005) (Phool Chandra Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and another) and order dated 09.07.2025 passed by the learned Court of Judicial Officer, Gram Nyayalaya, Shahganj, Jaunpur in Case No. 01 of 2023 (Neelam Vs. Phoolchand) with a further prayer to issue, an order or direction to the Gram Nayayalya, Shahganj, Jaunpur restraining it from executing the order dated
09.07.2025 passed by the learned Court of Judicial Officer, Gram Nyayalaya, Shahganj, Jaunpur in Case No. 01 of 2023 (Neelam Vs. Phoolchand) and further restraining it from adopting any coercive measures against the petitioner. And / or issue any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition be dismissed as withdrawn as he shall seek the appropriate remedy available to him under law.
Operative part
As prayed, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. March 19, 2026 AS Rathore (Samit Gopal,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: As prayed, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — s. 29.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.