High Court
Case Details
Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36474 of 2021 Applicant :- Kariya @ Sahul Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Nuruddin Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shabana Nizam Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Nuruddin Khan, learned counsel for the applicant, P.K.Bhardwaj, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant has approached this Court by way of filing the present Criminal Misc. Bail Application seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No.152 of 2021, under Sections 147,148, 323 and 304 of I.P.C., Police Station-Barsathi, District-Jaunpur after rejection of his Bail Application vide order dated 17.8.2021 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Jaunpur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that similarly situated co-accused Yogendra @ Jogendra, Baul Sonkar, Rahul Sonkar and Raju have been granted bail in Criminal Misc Bail Application Nos.34734 of 2021, 36053 of 2021 and 35593 of 2021 vide orders dated 2.11.2021, 26.11.2021 and 10.11.2021. 4. In the present case according to the averments made in the F.I.R. the applicant along with other seven accused persons formed an unlawful assembly and assaulted the persons from the complainant side who suffered injuries and one of the injured person namely Abhishek Sonkar died. However, after investigation, charge-sheet was filed only against the six accused persons including the applicant and two named accused were exonerated. Counsel for the applicant further submitted that the marriage of sister of the applicant is fixed for 4.4.2022. The applicant has no other reported criminal antecedent and he is languishing in jail since 19.7.2021, there is no likelihood of early disposal of trial and the applicant undertakes that if enlarged on bail, he will never misuse his liberty and will co- operate in the trial.
Legal Reasoning
into account certain factors such as existence of a prima facie case against the accused, gravity of the allegations, severity of punishment, position and status of the accused, likelihood of the accused fleeing from justice and repeating the offence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses and obstructing the Courts as well as the criminal antecedents of the accused. (B). It is also well settled that the Court while considering an application for bail must not go into deep into merits of the matter such as question of credibility and reliability of prosecution witnesses which can only be tested during the trial. Even ground of parity is one of the above mentioned aspects which are essentially required to be considered. (C). It is also well settled that the grant or refusal of bail is entirely within the discretion of the judge hearing the matter and though that discretion is unfettered, it must be exercised judiciously and in a humane manner, compassionately and not in whimsical manner. The Court should record the reasons which have weighed with the court for the exercise of its discretionary power for an order granting or rejecting bail. Conditions for the grant of bail ought not to be so strict as to be incapable of compliance, thereby making the grant of bail illusory. 7. Considering the rival submission, material available on record, the period of detention already undergone, the unlikelihood of early conclusion of trial, absence of any convincing material to indicate the possibility of tampering with the evidence, relevant factors mentioned above, particularly that the F.I.R. was lodged against eight persons. However, charge- sheet was filed only against six accsued persons out of which four co-accused have been granted bail and also considering that the marriage of sister of the applicant is fixed for 4.4.2022, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. 8. Let the applicant Kariya @ Sahul, involved in aforesaid case crime number be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever. (ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever. (iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under section 82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under section 174-A I.P.C. (v) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law and the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229- A IPC. (vi) The trial court may make all possible efforts/endeavour and try to conclude the trial expeditiously after the release of the applicant. 9. The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison. 10. The bail application is allowed. 11. The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad. 12.The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned. 13. The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. 14. The observations made hereinabove are only for the purpose of adjudicating the present bail application. Order Date :- 30.3.2022 SB Digitally signed by SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA Date: 2022.03.31 09:27:53 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Arguments
5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application however, he has not disputed that the that similarly situated co- accused have been granted bail. 6 (A). Law on bail is well settled that 'Bail is a rule and jail is an exception'. Bail should not be granted or rejected in a mechanical manner as it concerns liberty of a person. At the time of considering an application for bail, the Court must take