Virendra Kumar Verma v. State of U.P
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Applicant :- Virendra Kumar Verma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Kumar Srivastava, Rakesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Virendra Kumar Verma, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 403 of 2022, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Sector-49 Noida, District- Gautam Budh Nagar, during pendency of trial. According to the gang chart the applicant is said to has been involved in two criminal cases wherein he is on bail. The applicant alleges false implication in the present case due to police rivalry. He is languishing in jail since 25.11.2024.The applicant has no criminal history to his credit Having considered the material on record, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 8.4.2025 Atul kr. sri. ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 — ss. 2, 3; Constitution of India — art. 21.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 08 Apr 2025. The bench was SIDDHARTH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.