Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana and another
Case Details
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8892 of 2025 Pyare Lal Prajpati State of U.P. Versus .....Applicant(s) .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bindu Kumari, Janardan Yadav, Kiran Yadav, Sanjay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 70 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
Legal Reasoning
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The accused applicant is involved in Case Crime No.180 of 2024 under Sections 305(a), 317(2) B.N.S., Police Station Jangipur, District Ghazipur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the incident is alleged to have taken place on 13.12.2024 whereas the F.I.R., has been lodged on 14.12.2024 without there being any plausible explanation of such an inordinate delay. Learned counsel further argued that the applicant was arrested and from his possession, one Horlick, Chavanprash contained etc. along with recovery of Rs. 32,700/- is alleged to have been made from the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant further argued that in the arrest memo, no cause has been shown. In support of her submissions, learned counsel has relied upon a decision of Hon'ble Apex Court reported in [Vihaan Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and another (Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 13320 of 2024] and has relief upon paragraph no.11, 14, 21 and 26 which reads as under:-