High Court · 2025

1. Heard Sri Anil Srivastava, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Ram Bahadur, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rajesh Kumar Rao, learned Additional Government Advocate assisted by Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, learned brief holder representing for the State.

2. By means of this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., applicant-Bhagat Tanwar, who is involved in Case Crime No. 14 of 2025, under Sections 109, 118(2), 351(2), 352, 115(2) of B.N.S. 2023, Police Station Knowledge Park, District Gautam Buddh Nagar seeks enlargement on bail during the pendency of trial.

3. Brief facts of the case which are required to be stated are that complainant who is father of the injured got an F.I.R. lodged on 11.1.2025 against three unknown boys stating inter alia that his son- Kanav Negi is a student of BALLB 3rd year in Asian Law Collage. On 10.01.2025, he had come to give the paper I GINOT college. At around 1:30 PM, three boys called his son out of the car and without any reason, beaten him, due to which he got seriously injured. He was admitted in Kailash Hospital.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that it is a case of sudden quarrel. The applicant has not been assigned to role of causing injuries. Hence, the applicant, who is student having no criminal history and is languishing in jail since 13.01.2025 may be enlarged on bail. Lastly, it is submitted that in case, he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

5. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the state opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that in the said incident, applicant had held the hand of injured and his two friends attacked on injured-Kanav with sharp object and kicks, due to which Kanav got seriously injured. He was admitted in Kailash Hospital, where his operation was done and his kidney and spleen were removed and he also suffered injury in his pancreas. It is also pointed out that the reason for inflicting injuries was the suspicion that injured had some photographs of his girlfriend. Referring the injury report of the injured, it is also pointed out as per injury report, injured has received four visible injuries. In NCCT Chest, fracture of left body of scapula with surrounding subcutaneous and muscle emphysema was found and in CT scan of the injured Kanav Negi, suspicious fracture of 12th rib on left side was found.In CT scan of abdomen with contrast, minimal prominence of pancreatic duct was found with high suspicion of pancreatic ductal injury and laceration was also seen involving the pelvicalyceal system and segmental renal artery vein. Lastly it is submitted that considering the nature of injuries received to injured, bail application of the applicant is liable to be rejected. Here it would relevant to mention the statement of injured, which reads thus:- “बययान पपीडडित - कनव ननेगपी पपु्ቔ शपी बलनेदव ससिሺह ननेगपी डनवयासपी प्लनेट निሺ० 42D, पपौकने ट A, एक्सपनेस व्यय अपयाटरमनेन्ट, सनेक्टर 105 ननोएडिया नने पयछनने पर बतयायया डक सयाहब मम एडशियन ललॉ कलॉलनेज मम बपीए एलएलबपी ततृतपीय वरर कया छया्ቔ हह ूሺ। मनेरया दनोस्त अश्वनपी जनो मनेरने सयाथ इसपी कयालनेज मम पढतया थया अश्वनपी ककी करपीब 02 वरर पयवर डबमयारपी कने कयारण मतृत्यपु हनो गयपी थपी अश्वनपी ककी गलरफम डि सयययाኋ᭡शिपी नयाम ककी लड़ककी थपी जनो आपस मम कयाफकी अच्छने दनोस्त थने अश्वनपी ककी मतृत्यपु कने बयाद सयययाኋ᭡शिपी ककी दनोस्तपी व नजदपीककी हमयारने हपी कयालनेज मम पढ़नने वयालने भगत तनवर कने सयाथ हनो गयपी थपी जनो वतरमयान मम कयाफकी अच्छने दनोस्त हहै और भगत तनवर सयययाኋ᭡शिपी कया बयायफम डि भपी हहै यह जयानकयारपी मपुझने कयाफकी डदनोሪ सने हहै करपीब 15 डदन पहलने भगत तनवर जनो पहलने हमयारने हपी सयाथ पढ़तया थया लनेडकन डकसपी कयारणवशि उसकने दयारया पढ़याई छनोड़ दपी गयपी थपी और अब पपुननः वह हमयारने हपी कयालनेज मम एलएलबपी फस्टर ईयर कया छया्ቔ हहै , नने कयालनेज मम मपुझकनो यह कहतने हहए धमककी दपी थपी डक तपुम्हयारने पयास सयययाኋ᭡शिपी कने पयाइवनेट फनोटनो हहै और भडवष्य मम दनेख लनेनने ककी बयात भपी कहपी थपी लनेडकन मनेरने पयास सयययाኋ᭡शिपी कने डकसपी भपी पकयार कने कनोई फनोटनो नहीሻ हहै। लनेडकन भगत तनवर बहहत गपुस्सने मम व उतनेसजत थया उस डदन तनो वह चलया गयया थया। हमयारने कयालनेज ककी परपीकया GINOT कलॉलनेज मम चल रहने हहै। डदनयािሺक

10.01.2025 कनो भपी मम परपीकया दनेनने कने सलए GINOT कलॉलनेज नयालनेज पयाकर 2 आयया थया डदनयािሺक 10.01.2025 भगत तनवर कया पनेपर नहीሻ थया। मम । मम कयालनेज कने गनेट सने कपु छ दयर अपनपी गयाडिपी मम बहैठकर पढयाई कर रहया थया तभपी भगत तनवर व 02 अन्य लडिकने सजन्हम मम नहीሻ पहचयानतया हह ूሺ मनेरने पयास आयने थने तथया मपुझने मनेरपी गयाडिपी सने बयाहर बपुलयायया और भगत नने कहया डक यहपी कनव ननेगपी हहै इसने जयान सने मयार दनेतने हम भगत तनवर नने मनेरया हयाथ पकडि सलयया तथया सयाथ आयने लडिकोሪ नने मपुझने डकसपी नपुककीलपी चपीज सने मनेरने किሺ धने व कमर व ससर पर वयार डकयया तथया लयात घयसोሪ सने भपी मनेरने सयाथ मयार -डपटयाई ककी सजससने मनेरने कन्धने, कमर व ससर सने खयन डनकलनने लगया तथया मनेरने सयाथ मयारपपीट कर मपुझने वहीሻ छनोडिकर भयाग गयने थने मपुझने घयायल अवस्थया मम मनेरया दनोस्त जपुगल डकशिनोर कहै लयाशि अस्पतयाल परपी चपौक लने गयया थया जहयािሺ पर मनेरया इलयाज हहआ इलयाज कने दपौरयान मनेरया आपरनेशिन हहआ थया मपुझने 18.01.2025 कनो हलॉस्पपीटल सने डडिस्चयाजर डकयया गयया थया मनेरपी डकडिनपी , पहैनडቅኌययाज व सस्पसलन डिहैमनेज हनो गयने थने सजससने उन्हम डनकयालनया पड़या थया मपुझने अब भपी अपनया दहैडनक कयायर करनने मम तकलपीफ हनोतपी हहै मनेरया इलयाज चल रहया हहै मम अभपी पयणरतय स्वस्थ्य नहीሻ हह ूሺ।” In view of the above, considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case as well as keeping in view the submissions advanced on behalf of parties, gravity of offence, role assigned to applicant, nature of injury as noted above and severity of punishment, I do not find any good ground to disbelieve the statement of injured and release the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. It is made clear that the observations contained in the instant order are confined to the issue of bail and shall not affect the merit of the trial. It is open for the applicant to move second bail application after recording the statement of injured before the trial court. Copy of this order be sent to the complainant within three days for information. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 Sanjeet SANJEET KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

1. Heard Sri Anil Srivastava, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Ram Bahadur, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rajesh Kumar Rao, learned Additional Government Advocate assisted by Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, learned brief holder representing for the State.

2. By means of this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., applicant-Bhagat Tanwar, who is involved in Case Crime No. 14 of 2025, under Sections 109, 118(2), 351(2), 352, 115(2) of B.N.S. 2023, Police Station Knowledge Park, District Gautam Buddh Nagar seeks enlargement on bail during the pendency of trial.

3. Brief facts of the case which are required to be stated are that complainant who is father of the injured got an F.I.R. lodged on 11.1.2025 against three unknown boys stating inter alia that his son- Kanav Negi is a student of BALLB 3rd year in Asian Law Collage. On 10.01.2025, he had come to give the paper I GINOT college. At around 1:30 PM, three boys called his son out of the car and without any reason, beaten him, due to which he got seriously injured. He was admitted in Kailash Hospital.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that it is a case of sudden quarrel. The applicant has not been assigned to role of causing injuries. Hence, the applicant, who is student having no criminal history and is languishing in jail since 13.01.2025 may be enlarged on bail. Lastly, it is submitted that in case, he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

5. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the state opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that in the said incident, applicant had held the hand of injured and his two friends attacked on injured-Kanav with sharp object and kicks, due to which Kanav got seriously injured. He was admitted in Kailash Hospital, where his operation was done and his kidney and spleen were removed and he also suffered injury in his pancreas. It is also pointed out that the reason for inflicting injuries was the suspicion that injured had some photographs of his girlfriend. Referring the injury report of the injured, it is also pointed out as per injury report, injured has received four visible injuries. In NCCT Chest, fracture of left body of scapula with surrounding subcutaneous and muscle emphysema was found and in CT scan of the injured Kanav Negi, suspicious fracture of 12th rib on left side was found.In CT scan of abdomen with contrast, minimal prominence of pancreatic duct was found with high suspicion of pancreatic ductal injury and laceration was also seen involving the pelvicalyceal system and segmental renal artery vein. Lastly it is submitted that considering the nature of injuries received to injured, bail application of the applicant is liable to be rejected. Here it would relevant to mention the statement of injured, which reads thus:- “बययान पपीडडित - कनव ननेगपी पपु्ቔ शपी बलनेदव ससिሺह ननेगपी डनवयासपी प्लनेट निሺ० 42D, पपौकने ट A, एक्सपनेस व्यय अपयाटरमनेन्ट, सनेक्टर 105 ननोएडिया नने पयछनने पर बतयायया डक सयाहब मम एडशियन ललॉ कलॉलनेज मम बपीए एलएलबपी ततृतपीय वरर कया छया्ቔ हह ूሺ। मनेरया दनोस्त अश्वनपी जनो मनेरने सयाथ इसपी कयालनेज मम पढतया थया अश्वनपी ककी करपीब 02 वरर पयवर डबमयारपी कने कयारण मतृत्यपु हनो गयपी थपी अश्वनपी ककी गलरफम डि सयययाኋ᭡शिपी नयाम ककी लड़ककी थपी जनो आपस मम कयाफकी अच्छने दनोस्त थने अश्वनपी ककी मतृत्यपु कने बयाद सयययाኋ᭡शिपी ककी दनोस्तपी व नजदपीककी हमयारने हपी कयालनेज मम पढ़नने वयालने भगत तनवर कने सयाथ हनो गयपी थपी जनो वतरमयान मम कयाफकी अच्छने दनोस्त हहै और भगत तनवर सयययाኋ᭡शिपी कया बयायफम डि भपी हहै यह जयानकयारपी मपुझने कयाफकी डदनोሪ सने हहै करपीब 15 डदन पहलने भगत तनवर जनो पहलने हमयारने हपी सयाथ पढ़तया थया लनेडकन डकसपी कयारणवशि उसकने दयारया पढ़याई छनोड़ दपी गयपी थपी और अब पपुननः वह हमयारने हपी कयालनेज मम एलएलबपी फस्टर ईयर कया छया्ቔ हहै , नने कयालनेज मम मपुझकनो यह कहतने हहए धमककी दपी थपी डक तपुम्हयारने पयास सयययाኋ᭡शिपी कने पयाइवनेट फनोटनो हहै और भडवष्य मम दनेख लनेनने ककी बयात भपी कहपी थपी लनेडकन मनेरने पयास सयययाኋ᭡शिपी कने डकसपी भपी पकयार कने कनोई फनोटनो नहीሻ हहै। लनेडकन भगत तनवर बहहत गपुस्सने मम व उतनेसजत थया उस डदन तनो वह चलया गयया थया। हमयारने कयालनेज ककी परपीकया GINOT कलॉलनेज मम चल रहने हहै। डदनयािሺक

10.01.2025 कनो भपी मम परपीकया दनेनने कने सलए GINOT कलॉलनेज नयालनेज पयाकर 2 आयया थया डदनयािሺक 10.01.2025 भगत तनवर कया पनेपर नहीሻ थया। मम । मम कयालनेज कने गनेट सने कपु छ दयर अपनपी गयाडिपी मम बहैठकर पढयाई कर रहया थया तभपी भगत तनवर व 02 अन्य लडिकने सजन्हम मम नहीሻ पहचयानतया हह ूሺ मनेरने पयास आयने थने तथया मपुझने मनेरपी गयाडिपी सने बयाहर बपुलयायया और भगत नने कहया डक यहपी कनव ननेगपी हहै इसने जयान सने मयार दनेतने हम भगत तनवर नने मनेरया हयाथ पकडि सलयया तथया सयाथ आयने लडिकोሪ नने मपुझने डकसपी नपुककीलपी चपीज सने मनेरने किሺ धने व कमर व ससर पर वयार डकयया तथया लयात घयसोሪ सने भपी मनेरने सयाथ मयार -डपटयाई ककी सजससने मनेरने कन्धने, कमर व ससर सने खयन डनकलनने लगया तथया मनेरने सयाथ मयारपपीट कर मपुझने वहीሻ छनोडिकर भयाग गयने थने मपुझने घयायल अवस्थया मम मनेरया दनोस्त जपुगल डकशिनोर कहै लयाशि अस्पतयाल परपी चपौक लने गयया थया जहयािሺ पर मनेरया इलयाज हहआ इलयाज कने दपौरयान मनेरया आपरनेशिन हहआ थया मपुझने 18.01.2025 कनो हलॉस्पपीटल सने डडिस्चयाजर डकयया गयया थया मनेरपी डकडिनपी , पहैनडቅኌययाज व सस्पसलन डिहैमनेज हनो गयने थने सजससने उन्हम डनकयालनया पड़या थया मपुझने अब भपी अपनया दहैडनक कयायर करनने मम तकलपीफ हनोतपी हहै मनेरया इलयाज चल रहया हहै मम अभपी पयणरतय स्वस्थ्य नहीሻ हह ूሺ।” In view of the above, considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case as well as keeping in view the submissions advanced on behalf of parties, gravity of offence, role assigned to applicant, nature of injury as noted above and severity of punishment, I do not find any good ground to disbelieve the statement of injured and release the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. It is made clear that the observations contained in the instant order are confined to the issue of bail and shall not affect the merit of the trial. It is open for the applicant to move second bail application after recording the statement of injured before the trial court. Copy of this order be sent to the complainant within three days for information. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 Sanjeet SANJEET KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad