✦ Allahabad High Court

Lalit Kumar And 5 Others v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 7429 of 2022SIDDHARTHA VARMA, JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment

: G.A., Gaurav Kumar Srivastava Srivastava Court No. - 42 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.

1.

Sri Virendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners states that charge sheet has been submitted in this case, therefore, he does not want to press further the writ petition.

Operative part

2.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

3.

However, the record of this case be placed before the appropriate Court on 21.05.2026 along with the report of Mediation Centre as to whether the amount deposited by the petitioner, has been withdrawn by the first informant/ opposite party or not. May 7, 2026 S.K.S. (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 7429 of 2022). ← Search more judgments