Pankaj Rai v. State of U.P & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail refused
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
List has been revised. No one is present from the side of applicant. Sri Vivek Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Sarad Chand Rai, learned counsel for opposite party No.2 as well as learned A.G.A for the State is present. Sri Vivek Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Sarad Chand Rai, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 submits that in this case the applicant has been arrested, therefore, this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 17.1.2023 G.S GHAN SHYAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 17 Jan 2023. The bench was SUBHASH CHANDRA SHARMA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.