Mohd Amir & Anr. v. Mohammad Ali And 7 Others
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 05 Mar 2025
- Bench
- ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
- Neutral citation
- 2025:AHC:31760
Outcome
Disposed of
With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. VII r. 11
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
Judgment
This is defendant's petition. In a suit instituted by plaintiff respondents an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC has been moved by defendant petitioners, which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made in writ petition for early disposal of the said application.
As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondent, with a direction upon Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 9, Prayagraj to decide the application moved under Order VII Rule 11 CPC filed in Suit No. 61 of 2025, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Operative part
With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 5.3.2025 Shekhar SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. VII r. 11.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 05 Mar 2025. The bench was ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.