✦ Allahabad High Court · 13 Feb 2025

Shambhu Ram v. State Of U.P. And 7 Other

No. 1381 of 2025ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.

Judgment

1.

This is plaintiff's petition. In a suit filed by plaintiff, an application for grant of temporary injunction was filed which was allowed by trial court. According to petitioner's counsel, the order granting temporary injunction has been violated by defendant. An application under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC was moved which has been registered as Case No. 18 of 2025 and the same is pending consideration since 16.01.2025.

2.

The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the application under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC.

3.

As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ghazipur to decide the Case No. 18 of 2025, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

Operative part

4.

With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.

5.

It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 13.2.2025 V.S.Singh VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 39 r. 2A.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 13 Feb 2025. The bench was ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 1381 of 2025). ← Search more judgments