Gopal Prasad Kapoor v. Smt Annaporna Bagchi And 11 Others
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. 1 r. 10
Judgment
As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon Civil Judge (Senior Division), Varanasi to decide the temporary injunction application (6-C) and also application (36C) under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. filed in Suit No. 345 of 2019 (Rathindra Narayan Bagchi vs. Ashish Kumar Bagchi), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two and three months respectively, from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. Order Date :- 13.2.2025 Kushal KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 1 r. 10.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 13 Feb 2025. The bench was ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.