Krishna Kumar v. State of U.P & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Applicant :- Krishna Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vikas Srivastava, Hari Narayan Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J. Heard Mr. Vikas Srivastava, the learned counsel for applicant and the learned A.G.A. for State. Perused the record. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by complainant praying for a direction to the Court below i.e. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.7, Allahabad to decide Criminal Complaint Case No. 191 of 2021 (Krishna Kumar Vs. Rajesh Kumar Sharma) under Section 138 N.I. Act, P.s. Phoolpur, District Allahabad within a time fixed by this Court. At the very outset, the learned A.G.A. has raised a preliminary objection by submitting that the accused has yet not appeared before the court below. In view of above, the prayer made by means of present application is wholly misconceived. As such, present application is liable to be dismissed. When confronted with above, learned counsel for applicant could not overcome the same. As a result, present application fails and is liable to be dismissed. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 20.3.2023 CS/- CHANDAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — s. 138.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 20 Mar 2023. The bench was RAJEEV MISRA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.