Kamlesh Singh Yadav v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Operative part
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. By means of present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed following relief: "1 issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the learned court below to decide the case no. 01716 of 2020, computerized case no. T202014290501716 (Report Lekhpal v. Shiv Yadav) as expeditiusly as possible, pending in the court of Tehsildar, Tehsil Jakhaniya District Ghazipur within the time stipulated by this Court otherwise the petitioner shall suffer an irreparable loss and injury" Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proceeding has already been drawn against the unauthorized encroachers under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code and now the case is registered as case No. T202014290501716. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the concerned designated respondent to conclude the proceeding pending before him under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. It is further provided that the concerned respondent shall follow the procedure prescribed for under the relevant Rules and the Code. Needless to add that such authority shall afford reasonable opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned and shall also pass a reasoned and speaking order. Order Date :- 6.7.2022 Sanjeev RANJAN Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 06 Jul 2022. The bench was AJIT KUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.