Maroof v. State of U.P & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
is dismissed as withdrawn with the
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant for quashing the impugned charge sheet dated 10.06.2020 against the applicant submitted by the police of Police Station Mirzapur, District Saharanpur along with entire proceedings of the case and consequent summoning order in Criminal Case No. 77 of 2021 (State Vs. Maroof & others) under Section 379 I.P.C. and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, arising out of Case Crime No. 13/2020, Police Station Mirzapur, District Saharanpur, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate IInd, Saharanpur. After some argument, learned counsel for the applicant states that he may be permitted to withdraw this application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with liberty to file bail application before the court below. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. Under the circumstances, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to applicant to approach the court concerned for bail. In order to enable the applicant to approach the court concerned for bail, for a period of 30 days, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. In case, the bail application is preferred by the applicant before the court concerned, the court concerned shall decide the same expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournment to any party. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty and direction. Order Date :- 14.2.2023 VMA VISHWA MOHAN ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: is dismissed as withdrawn with the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 379; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 — s. 3.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 14 Feb 2023. The bench was VIKRAM D CHAUHAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.