Ayodhya v. State of U.P & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default of
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. XLI r. 19
Judgment
Operative part
Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 433 of 1998 Appellant :- Ayodhya Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- S.K.Singh,V.K.Singh Counsel for Respondent :- S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J. The matter was called out for hearing today. Despite repeated calls, none appeared on behalf of the appellant. There is also no representation on record to indicate any valid ground for non- appearance. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default of appearance. However, it is made clear that the appellant shall be at liberty to file an application for restoration under order XLI Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, if so advised, subject to showing sufficient cause for non-appearance. Order Date :- 8.4.2025 Rahul RAHUL KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XLI r. 19.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 08 Apr 2025. The bench was SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.