Sri Nanhe Lal v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 363
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 156(3)
Judgment
Petitioner :- Sri Nanhe Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents. The present petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondent authorities to conclude the fair investigation of Case Crime No. 598 of 2021, under Section 363 I.P.C., P.S.-Kalan, District- Shahjahanpur. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the police is acting in collusion with the accused persons and as yet neither the accused persons have been arrested nor any charge sheet has been filed against the accused persons. Admittedly, petitioner is aggrieved by the manner of investigation said to have been conducted against private respondents.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 363; Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 156(3).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 18 Feb 2022.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.