✦ Allahabad High Court · 15 Jan 2025

Mohammad Sultan Haidar v. Mrs. Smita D Silva

No. 295 of 2025ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL

Case at a glance

Judgment

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that petitioner and respondent had entered into wedlock on 15.11.2016 under the Special Marriage Act, 1954. A matrimonial dispute has arisen between the parties which led to filing of the present petition. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for early disposal of Case No.907 of 2023. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to the private respondent, the matter is being disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction upon Additional Family Court Judge to conclude the Case No.907 of 2023, if there is no legal impediment and after hearing all the concerned parties, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. Order Date :- 15.1.2025 SK Goswami SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 227; Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 15 Jan 2025. The bench was ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 295 of 2025). ← Search more judgments