✦ Allahabad High Court · 09 Mar 2022

Km. Mahak Naz @ Mehak Bano & Anr. v. State Of U.P. And 5 Others

WRIT - C No. 1559 of 2022KAUSHAL JAYENDRA THAKER, AJAI TYAGI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Partly allowed

With these observations, this petition is partly allowed

Judgment

7.

Since the writ petition is being disposed of at the stage of fresh motion itself and notices have not been issued to private respondents, as such, liberty is given to them to file a recall, in case any of the averments made in the writ petition are found to be incorrect, and this order shall stand automatically vacated, in case any First Information Report has been lodged in the matter. Order Date :- 9.3.2022/Mukesh SRIVASTAVA Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With these observations, this petition is partly allowed

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 09 Mar 2022. The bench was KAUSHAL JAYENDRA THAKER, AJAI TYAGI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WRIT - C No. 1559 of 2022). ← Search more judgments