Vidyawati @ Neha Prajapati v. Braj Kishor
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the above observations, the petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 125
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
Petitioner :- Vidyawati @ Neha Prajapati Respondent :- Braj Kishor Counsel for Petitioner :- Shri Prakash Dwivedi Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has filed a case under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for maintenance on 18.11.2019 before Principal Judge, Family Court, Mirzapur as Case Crime No.510 of 2019 (Vidyawati@ Neha Prajapati Vs. Braj Kishor). However, the case was pending for a long time due to non-appearnace of opposite party/respondent. The opposite party appeared in the said case on 05.05.2022 and filed a Vakalatnama, however no hearing could be done in the matter till date and no order, in the said maintenance case, has been passed in spite of lapse of period of 3 years. As the prayer made in the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the same is dispose of with a direction to Principal Judge, Mirzapur to expedite the hearing of the Case No. 510 of 2019 in (Vidyawati@ Neha Prajapati Vs. Braj Kishor) and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably within 6 months, provided, there is no legal impediment. In view of the above observations, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 3.2.2023 Nitika NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above observations, the petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 125; Constitution of India — art. 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 03 Feb 2023.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.