Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut v. ONGC as agent of British
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 05 Aug 2003
- Bench
- P C VERMA
Outcome
Disposed of
The applications are disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Mr. S.K. Posti, Advocate for the applicant(s) Mr. J.P. Joshi, Advocate for the respondent(s) Coram: Hon. S.H. Kapadia,C.J. Hon. P.C.Verma, J. Date: 5.08.2003 PC: A short question which arises for determination applications under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is whether total income of Oil and Natural Gas Commission/assessee should include payment of surtax, which O. N. G. C. has paid under the Companies (Profits)Surtax Act, 1964. The main objection of O.N.G.C. to these application is that O.N.G.C. was exempted under the provisions of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 and, therefore, it can not form part of the total taxable income under the Income Tax Act. This question is of some relevance and importance and in our view it needs to be answered by this Court under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, we formulate the following question and direct the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to refer the matter to this Court at the earliest along with statement of facts: Whether the surtax which stands exempted as far as O.N.G.C. is concerned by vide of notification the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 is includable in the total income of the assessee? As stated above, important question of is a an law. from provisions of Therefore, the application is granted. The Tribunal shall forward the statement of case and also refer the question to this Court for our opinion. Office is directed to list these matters immediately on receipt of papers from the Tribunal. The applications are disposed of accordingly. (P. C. Verma,J.) (S. H. Kapadia, C.J.) AK
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The applications are disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Income Tax Act, 1961 — s. 256(2); Companies (Profits)Surtax Act, 1964; Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Uttarakhand High Court, on 05 Aug 2003. The bench was P C VERMA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.