✦ Uttarakhand High Court

Judgment · High Court

ALOK MAHRA2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Bail granted

Let the applicant be released on bail,

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr. Vikas Anand and Ms. Gyan Mati learned counsels Kushwaha, applicant.

2.

Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, Brief Holder for the State.

3.

Applicant- Ram Avtar @ Kallu, who is in Judicial custody in connection with Case Crime/FIR No. 148 of 2016, under Sections 304 IPC, registered at Police Station Sitarganj, District Udham Singh Nagar, has sought his release on bail. Heard learned counsel

4.

parties and perused the material available on record. Learned counsel for the applicant 5. contends that the applicant was not named in the First Information Report; he was charge-sheeted on the basis of the statements recorded by the Investigating Officer; the deceased had taken the motorcycle of the accused on 27.05.2015. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that FIR was lodged by brother of the deceased; the deceased died on account of road accident and they came to photographs of newspaper; FIR was lodged after much delay i.e. on 30.05.2016 whereas as per the deceased seeing the prosecution story the deceased had taken the motorcycle of the accused on 27.05.2016. The applicant is languishing in jail since 26.09.2024. 6. Respondent-State have they have counter affidavit wherein enclosed the statements of PW1-Saurabh Sharma, PW2- Retired Doctor I.A. Khan, and PW3-Umesh Sharma & PW 4 Rajneesh Sharma.

7.

Counsel for the applicant submitted that there is no material on the basis of the statement of the prosecution witnesses that would relate deceased with the accused. the death of submission 8. Considering learned counsel the parties and without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail at this stage.

9.

Accordingly the bail application is allowed.

Operative part

10.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of like amount, to the satisfaction of Court concerned.

16.05.2025 (Alok Mahra, J.) Kaushal

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Let the applicant be released on bail,

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 304.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Uttarakhand High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments