High Court · 2025

or infirm it y in t he im pugned or der, which m ay warrant int erfer ence of t his Court . 1 1 . We find subst ance in t he subm issions m ade by learned St at e Counsel. 1 2 . Since pet it ioner accept ed em ploy m ent as Junior Engineer in Ant ar Gram in Sadak Nirm an Yoj ana wit h eyes wide open t hat his st at us will be t hat of an adhoc em ployee and t her e is no provision for regular appoint m ent in t he said Yoj ana, t herefor e, t he pet it ioner cannot have a legit im at e grievance t hat he has been subj ect ed t o host ile discrim inat ion. Ther e is no provision which can be pressed int o service for grant ing r egular st at us t o t he pet it ioner. Thus, t he r elief as claim ed cannot be grant ed t o t he pet it ioner. 1 3 . I n view of aforesaid discussion, writ pet it ion fails and is dism issed. ( Su b h ash Up a d h y ay , J.) ( M a n o j K u m ar Ti w a r i , J.) 15.07.2025 15.07.2025 Raj ni RAJINI GUSAI N DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=97cfa6e4cbd49c07b876db 48448ac3701a9ae475a2547e4b7f1 d9b1f17d01342, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=8D039BC77BD1A22 22B4DF4FC80D4557562F95BEBA01 3F530616A158A0A878BD8, cn=RAJINI GUSAIN